Wealden District Council
You are using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.
Parts of our website may display incorrectly or not work at all. Please consider downloading an up to date browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Tenant Satisfaction Measures Report 2025-2026

Weightings

A survey that has met the sample size requirements can still be biased if certain groups are under or over-represented. Therefore, it is sometimes necessary to weight the responses to ensure the TSMs reported are representative as far as possible. Weighting data is a technique to adjust the data collected from a sample to reflect the total population. Using the profile characteristics in the TSM technical guidance, we have added the following weightings to our data to ensure the responses are representative of both our tenants and our stock type and size. We weighted by 5 elements – tenants age and ethnicity and stock type (general needs to include temporary accommodation and retirement living), the property types to cover house, flats, bungalows and property size based upon how many bedrooms it had

The tables below show our actual profile and the profile of respondents – each individual response was given a weighting to ensure that we achieved the target profile from our results this was done for each respondent for each question since not all respondents answered all questions.

 

Actual WDC Tenant %

TSM respondent %

Difference

Stock Type

   

General Stock

84.53%

79.73%

4.80%

Retirement Living

14.52%

19.77%

-5.25%

Temporary

0.95%

0.50%

0.45%

Property Type

   

Flat & Bedsit

48.70%

50.83%

-2.13%

Bungalow

8.64%

13.79%

-5.15%

House

42.66%

35.38%

7.28%

Property Size

   

0 bed

0.20%

0.00%

0.20%

1 bed

40.95%

47.67%

-6.72%

2 beds

31.00%

29.40%

1.60%

3 beds

26.57%

22.09%

4.48%

4 beds

1.22%

0.66%

0.56%

5+ beds

0.07%

0.17%

-0.10%

Ethnicity

   

White-British

55.51%

55.81%

-0.30%

Ethnicity not known

42.32%

42.36%

-0.04%

Ethnic minority

2.17%

1.83%

0.34%

AgeBand

   

16 to 24

1.97%

1.16%

0.81%

25 to 34

9.86%

6.81%

3.05%

35 to 44

15.13%

6.64%

8.49%

45 to 54

14.30%

9.97%

4.33%

55 to 64

19.46%

20.10%

-0.64%

65 to 74

18.49%

25.08%

-6.59%

75 to 84

14.46%

21.26%

-6.80%

85+

5.23%

8.14%

-2.91%

Not known

1.10%

0.83%

0.27%

    

 

 

Survey Method and Response Rate

At the end of the data collection period, 602 responses were received to the survey that went out representing a 20.28% response rate. This is a fair response rate for research of this type and as highlighted above it is statistically reliable. However, it is lower than our response rate in 2023-24 which was 26% and in 2024-25 where it was 29.99%.

 

 

Low Cost Rented Accommodation responses

Method used to send the Survey

Number sent by this Method

Number of Responses

Response Rate by each method

Online (includes both emails and text messages with a link to the online survey)

2,637

475

16.17%

Post

321

127

39.56%

Total

2969

602

20.28%

The overall response rate was 20.28%.

Of the 602 responses 78.9% were from online surveys against 21.1% which were postal surveys.

 

 

Response type by stock type:

Response by method type

Retirement Living

General Needs (including temporary)

Online

96

379

Post

24

103

Total

120

482

Accuracy of Data[1]

With a total of 602 tenant responses to the survey an accuracy of 3.57[2] overall is achieved which allows the survey findings to be used with confidence[3]. Rounded up to 4% this means that if 50% of respondents answer “very satisfied” to a question in the survey, then we know that between 46% and 54% of all households would give the same response, including those who did not return a completed survey form.

The TSM technical guidance requires for providers with between 2,500 and 9,999 properties such as us, a + or – 4% accuracy rate and so at 3.57% our LCRA (rented homes for which we are required to report back to the regulator on) exceeds this requirement. Therefore, based upon the number of responses, the accuracy levels achieved means that the results are statistically reliable and can be relied upon to be an accurate reflection of our tenant’s views.

[1] 95% confidence rate is considered the best for any survey. Accuracy is determined using a mathematical formula and an online calculator has been used to obtain this https://aytm.com/pages/mes which also provides more information on statistical reliability

[2] Margin Of Error Calculator – SmartSurvey

[3] Based on a confidence level of 95% which is inline with the technical requirements and best practice.

[1] 95% confidence rate is considered the best for any survey. Accuracy is determined using a mathematical formula and an online calculator has been used to obtain this https://aytm.com/pages/mes which also provides more information on statistical reliability

[1] Margin Of Error Calculator – SmartSurvey

[1] Based on a confidence level of 95% which is inline with the technical requirements and best practice.

Profile of Respondents

 Responses by age

The table below shows that responses by age.

Age Band

 Ages of all lead tenants at the time of the survey

 Age of all respondents at the time of the survey

Difference between tenant age profile and respondent age profile

16 to 24

1.97%

1.16%

0.80%

25 to 34

9.86%

6.81%

3.05%

35 to 44

15.13%

6.64%

8.48%

45 to 54

14.30%

9.97%

4.33%

55 to 64

19.46%

20.10%

-0.64%

65 to 74

18.49%

25.08%

-6.59%

75 to 84

14.46%

21.26%

-6.80%

85+

5.23%

8.14%

-2.91%

Not known

1.10%

0.83%

0.27%

Tenant Total

   

The data above shows that the age profile of respondents did not reflect those of our tenant population with some ages overrepresented and some under representative and therefore weightings were used to ensure that the data was representative and reliable.

 Gender

In looking at the results we have analysed the responses by gender, 64.68% of respondents to the survey were females and 34.83% males. This is fairly consistent with the popular profile of Wealden’s tenants of which 67% are females and 32.71% males. As a result, we have not added any weighting to the results.

 Ethnicity

 In looking at the results we have analysed the responses by ethnicity and can see that we have had a lower response from tenants whose ethnicity is unknown than our population of these tenants[1]. The response data has been weighted by ethnicity to ensure that it is representative and reliable.

Ethnicity

 Ethnicity of all tenants at the time of the survey

 Ethnicity of all tenants that responded to the survey

 Difference between the tenant profile and respondent profile

White-British

55.51%

55.81%

-0.30%

Ethnicity not known

42.32%

42.36%

-0.04%

Ethnic minority

2.17%

1.83%

0.34%

 Responses by accommodation occupied

 Responses by stock type occupied

In looking at the results, we have analysed the responses by the classification of the building/stock type covering general needs, temporary accommodation and Retirement Living.

 

Actual stock type profile %

Profile of stock occupied by respondent %

Difference between actual profile and respondent %

Stock Type

   

General Stock

84.53%

79.73%

4.80%

Retirement Living

14.52%

19.77%

-5.25%

Temporary

0.95%

0.50%

0.45%

We can see that although only 14.52% of our stock is retirement living, 19.77% of respondents to the survey lived in retirement living, whereas the respondent profile of tenants living in general needs housing was underrepresented by 4.80%. Therefore, the data was weighted to ensure that it was representative and reliable.

 

Response rate by Property type

In looking at the results we have analysed the responses by the type of property occupied covering houses, bungalows and flats (including maisonettes) and bedsits.

Property Type

 Profile of our stock

Profile of respondents living in this type of property

 Difference between property type profile and profile of respondents living in this type of property

Flat & Bedsit

48.70%

50.83%

-2.13%

Bungalow

8.64%

13.79%

-5.15%

House

42.66%

35.38%

7.28%

The table above highlights response from respondents living in both houses and bungalows was overrepresented whereas for those living is flats was an under representation. The data has therefore been weighted to adjust the results for this difference to ensure the results are reliable. 

Responses by size of the property occupied

 

Finally, in looking at the results we have analysed the responses by the number of bedrooms the property has covering 0 (bedsits), 1, 2, 3, 4 and those with 5 or more bedrooms.

 

Property Size

 Profile of Properties of this type owned

 Profile of property type occupied by respondents

 Difference between actual profile of property size in the district and the profile of property size occupied by respondents

0 bed

0.20%

0.00%

0.20%

1 bed

40.95%

47.67%

-6.72%

2 beds

31.00%

29.40%

1.60%

3 beds

26.57%

22.09%

4.48%

4 beds

1.22%

0.66%

0.55%

5+ beds

0.07%

0.17%

-0.10%

Stock Total

   

 The table above shows although we only own 40.95% of properties with 1 bedroom 47.67% of respondents lived in a property with 1 bedroom whereas 26.57% of our properties had 3 bedrooms and yet only 22.09% of respondents lived in a property with 3 bedrooms. The data was therefore weighted to take account of this difference and ensure that the results are reliable.

[1] Ethnicity might not be recorded for a number of reasons but usually it because the person has been a tenant for a very long time and this information wasn’t collected when they first became a tenant.

Part 1: Tenant Perception Measures – tenants of Low Cost Rented Accommodation (LCRA):

The weighted results are the one reported back to the Housing Regulator and not the unweighted results. The return calculates the figure to one decimal place so rounding up and down is used.

Measure

TSM 2025 number of responses (unweighted)

TSM 25 unweighted

responses

TSM weighted responses

TSM 24

Number of completed responses

TSM Satisfaction Result 2024 – weighted to ensure they are representative of our tenants and the homes they live in[i]

TSM Satisfaction Result 2024 – unweighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP01 Overall Satisfaction

597

85.9% satisfied

 

8.4% dissatisfied

 

5.7% neutral

83.2% satisfied

 

9.6% dissatisfied

 

7.3% neutral

885

80.4% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied[ii]  11.83%

 

Neutral response 7.8%

84.5% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 9.15%

 

Neutral response 6.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP02 Satisfaction with repairs

454 answered yes so provided a satisfaction rating

88.6%

satisfied

 

7.2% dissatisfied

 

4.2% neutral

87% satisfied

 

8.6% dissatisfied

 

4.4% neutral

663

Of those that had reported a repair in the past 12 months:

 

78.3%

Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 13.01%

 

Neutral response 8.67%

 

Of those that had reported a repair in the past 12 months:

 

84.3%

Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 9.2%

 

Neutral response 6.49%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP03 Satisfaction with the time taken to complete most recent repair

448 answered yes so provided a satisfaction rating

85.5%

satisfied

 

9.6% dissatisfied

 

4.9% neutral

83.9% Satisfied

 

11.3% dissatisfied

 

4.8% neutral

647

Of those that had reported a repair:

 

 

 

 

76.8% Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 16.58%

 

Neutral response 6.60%

 

 

 

Of those that had reported a repair:

 

 

 

 

81.5% Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 12.83%

 

Neutral response 5.72%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP04 Satisfaction that the home is well maintained

599

85.3%

satisfied

 

7% dissatisfied

 

7.7% neutral

80.7% Satisfied

 

10 % dissatisfied

 

9.3% neutral

885

75.6% Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 14.35%

 

Neutral response 9.94%

 

83.2% Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 9.38%

 

Neutral response 7.46%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP05 Satisfaction that the home is safe

597

87.1% satisfied

 

7.6% dissatisfied

 

5.4% neutral

83.9% Satisfied

 

9.6 % dissatisfied

 

6.4% neutral

878

79.1% Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 13.33%

 

Neutral response 7.53%

 

85.3% Satisfied

 

Dissatisfied 8.66%

 

Neutral response 6.04%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP06 Satisfaction that the landlord listens to the tenant views and acts upon them

554

71.1% satisfied

 

13.4% dissatisfied

 

15.5% neutral

67.4% satisfied

 

15.1% dissatisfied

 

17.6% neutral

821

65.3% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 18.68%

 

Neutral response 15.94%

 

70.8% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 15.59%

 

Neutral response 13.64%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP07 Satisfaction that the landlord keeps tenants informed about things that matter to them

579

81% Satisfied

 

7.6 % dissatisfied

 

11.4% neutral

78.9% Satisfied

 

9.4 % dissatisfied

 

11.8% neutral

858

74.2% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 10.41%

 

Neutral response 15.40%

 

79.6% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 8.39%

 

Neutral response 12%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP08 Agreement that the landlord treats tenants fairly and with respect

593

82.8% Satisfied

 

8% dissatisfied

 

9.3% neutral

80.6% Satisfied

 

9.3 % dissatisfied

 

10.2% neutral

867

76.5% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 9.74%

 

Neutral response 13.75%

 

79.9% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 8.18%

 

Neutral response 11.88%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP09 Satisfaction with the landlord’s approach to handling complaints

100 respondents had made a complaint in the previous 12 months so provided a satisfaction rating

32% Satisfied

 

51 % dissatisfied

 

17% neutral

30.2% Satisfied

 

54.67% dissatisfied

 

15.2% neutral

192

Of those that had

made a complaint in the past 12 months

 

41.1% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 45.5%

 

Neutral response 13.52%

 

Of those that had

made a complaint in the past 12 months

 

43.2% Satisfied

 

 

Dissatisfied 44.27%

 

Neutral response 12.50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP10 Satisfaction that the landlord keeps communal areas clean and well maintained

271 respondents live in a building with communal areas so provided a satisfaction rating)

74.2% Satisfied

 

12.2% dissatisfied

 

13.7% neutral

70.7% Satisfied

 

13.7% dissatisfied

 

15% neutral

390

Of those respondents that live somewhere with communal areas that the council maintains

 

 

Of these

 

69.7% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 19.68%

 

Neutral response 10.64%

 

Of those  respondents that live somewhere with communal areas that the council maintains

 

 

Of these

 

76.4%

Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 14.1%

 

Neutral response 9.49%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP11 Satisfaction that the landlord makes a positive contribution to neighbourhoods

419

71.6% Satisfied

 

9.8% dissatisfied

 

18.6% neutral

68.6% Satisfied

 

19.7% dissatisfied

 

11.7% neutral

631

68.3% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 5.06%

 

Neutral response 25.8%

 

73.4% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied

6.02%

 

Neutral response 20.60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TP12 Satisfaction with the landlord’s approach to handling anti-social behaviour

353

65.2% Satisfied

 

17% dissatisfied

 

17.9% neutral

61.8% Satisfied

 

14.3% dissatisfied

 

18.5% neutral

567

57.8% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 19.8%

 

Neutral response 21.27%

 

62.8% Satisfied

 

 

 

Dissatisfied 18.69%

 

Neutral response 18.52%

 

Note: Neutral for this report has included where the respondent chose the “neither” option (don’t know/ not applicable have been excluded).  Also, due to rounding up or down the totals might not be exactly 100% but are in accordance with our statutory return. 

As part of the new Housing Regulation, we will be submitting our results to the Housing Regulator before 30th June 2026. The regulator intends to publish the results of all social housing providers which will be available at: Reports and statistics – GOV.UK

 [ii] Remainder gave a neural response such as neither satisfied nor dissatisfied or unsure

As part of our return to the Regulator for social Housing we have to report back on a number of other measures, the data from which comes for our IT systems. Part 2: Systems Data

Property Measures:

RP01-Homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard Results for 25-26 Results for 24-25
Tenants Satisfaction Measure Proportion of homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard   Low Cost Rented Accommodation only. 2.3%   Or 71 rented homes. 2.4%   Or 72 rented homes.
RP02- Repairs completed with target timescale    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of: 1) non-emergency and       2) emergency responsive repairs completed within the landlord’s target timescale   Low Cost Rented Accommodation only.       88.4% Or 7438 of our 8410 non-emergency repairs completed on time.   99.2% Or 1200 of our 1200 emergency repairs completed on time. 92.9% Or 6666 of our 7175 non-emergency repairs competed on time.   98.6% Or 958 of our 972 emergency repairs completed on time.        
BS01- Gas safety checks    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of homes for which all required gas safety checks have been carried out.   Low Cost Rented Accommodation and Low Cost Home Ownership combined (excluding 100% shared owners). 99.98%   2585 of our 2586 homes with gas have had a gas safety check. 100%   All 2612 of our homes with gas have had a gas safety check.
BS02- Fire safety checks    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of homes for which all required fire risk assessments have been carried out.   Low Cost Rented Accommodation and Low Cost Home Ownership combined (excluding 100% shared owners).       100%     All 1027 of our homes that require a fire risk assessment have had this carried out. 100%   All 1044 of our homes that require a fire risk assessment have had this carried out.
BS03- Asbestos safety checks    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of homes for which all required asbestos management surveys or re-inspections have been carried out.   Low Cost Rented Accommodation and Low Cost Home Ownership combined (excluding 100% shared owners).   100%   Communal areas serving 895 of our homes meet this requirement. 100%   Communal areas serving 910 of our homes meet this requirement.
BS04- Water safety checks    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of homes for which all required legionella risk assessments have been carried out.   Low Cost Rented Accommodation and Low Cost Home Ownership combined (excluding 100% shared owners). 100%   We have 456 homes that need water safety checks. 100%   We have 473 homes that need water safety checks.
BS05- Lift safety checks    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of homes for which all required communal passenger lift safety checks have been carried out.   Low Cost Rented Accommodation and Low Cost Home Ownership combined (excluding 100% shared owners). 100%   We have 393 homes served by a lift all of which are in retirement living. 100%   We have 409 homes served by a lift all of which are in retirement living.
      Non-property Measures:   Remainder gave a neural response such as neither satisfied nor dissatisfied or unsure </P
NM01- Anti-social behaviour cases relative to the size of the landlord Data for 25-26 Data for 24-25
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Number of: 1)    anti-social behaviour cases, of which 2)    anti-social behaviour cases that involve hate incidents opened per 1,000 homes. Low Cost Rented Accommodation and Low Cost Home Ownership. 24.9% (78 cases)   0.3% (1 case out of the 78 involved hate incidents)   19.1% (60 cases)   0.3% (1 case out of the 60 involved hate incidents)          
CH01- Complaints Relative to the size of the landlord    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Number of: 1. stage one complaints and 2. stage two complaints received per 1,000 homesLow Cost Rented Accommodation only. Stage 1: 14.4% – 44 landlord related complaints   Stage 2: 3.9% – 12 complaints proceeded to stage 2 Stage 1: 18.7% – 57 landlord related complaints.   Stage 2: 4.9% – 6 complaints proceeded to stage 2.
CH02- Complaints responded to within complain Handling code timescales    
Tenant Satisfaction Measure Proportion of: 1)    stage one complaints responded to and 2)    stage two complaints responded to within the Housing Ombudsman’s Complaint Handling Code timescales. Low Cost Rented Accommodation only. 90.9% – 40 out of the 44 stage 1 complaints were responded to on time (2 of the 40 had an extension).   83.3% 10 out of the 12 stage 2 complaints were responded to on time (just 1 of the 10 had an extension).   40.4% – 23 out of the 57 stage 1 complaints received were responded to in time (all 23 without the use of the permitted extension).   60% – 9 out of the 15 stage 2 complaints were responded to in time (8 out of the 9 were without the use of a permitted extension).

Remainder gave a neural response such as neither satisfied nor dissatisfied or unsure